
-
Florida Professional
Paddlesports Association
-
P.O. Box 1764, Arcadia, FL
34266
-
800-268-0083, 863-494-4391
fax
October
20, 2005
Re:
Canoe and Kayak Registration
Dear
Brevard Board of County Commissioners:
The Florida Professional
Paddlesports Association (FPPA), on behalf of its 60 professional business
members who offer paddling opportunities to the public across the state of
Florida, would like to express its strong opposition to the registration of
canoes and kayaks.
To
properly consider whether the registration of canoes and kayaks is
warranted, there should first be an understanding of how registration would
affect Florida paddlers, businesses and well as individuals. Please refer
to the attached documents from the American Canoe Association (ACA), the
FPPA, and Professional Paddlesports Association (PPA) regarding canoe and
kayak registration. The FPPA concerns echo the points made by the ACA and
FPPA members have added additional concerns.
Many
Florida paddlers have contacted FPPA and expressed deep concern about canoe
and kayak registration.
These
paddlers feel that the passage of canoe and kayak any registration proposals
would result in paddlers shouldering an economic burden that is
disproportionate, and would force them to pay fees to an agency that lacks
the understanding, ability and desire necessary to serve the recreational
and safety needs of paddlers.
The
FPPA has already expressed its willingness to work with the Florida Wildlife
Conservation Commission (FWCC) to build a better relationship with the
paddlesports community and to help address canoe and kayak related safety
issues.
Please consider the concerns and questions the members of FPPA and other
paddlesport enthusiasts have attached. For all these reasons, the FPPA
requests that you do not support canoe and kayak registration. If you have
any questions about the FPPA position on this matter, please do not hesitate
to contact me at 863-494-1215.
Sincerely,
- Rebecca Ann Bragg
- President
- Florida Professional
Paddlesports Association
- 863-494-1215
-
canoefla@desoto.net
-
Received via e-mail on October 14, 2005 from the American Canoe
Association (ACA)
- ACA Position on Canoe and Kayak
Registration
The ACA
is generally opposed to the registration of canoes and kayaks. While we
recognize that states have an incentive to register canoes and kayaks, and
also acknowledge that paddlers do impose some burden on boating
administrators, we believe most legislative and regulatory proposals are
excessive because the costs imposed on paddlers would be disproportionate to
the services paddlers receive. Here are some of the reasons the ACA opposes
registration:
-
Canoes and kayaks do not
present the same enforcement burden and costs as do other craft. Canoes
and kayaks are not capable of breaking speed limits or putting other
waterway users at risk. Canoes and kayaks do not require expensive access
ramps like larger craft, they do not emit hydrocarbon pollution into our
waters, and because they are quieter, they are less likely to disturb
wildlife and waterfront homeowners. States should encourage paddling as a
non-polluting, healthy, mode of transportation and recreation.
-
Vessel registration
typically requires the display of 3" registration numbers on the hulls of
each vessel. Paddlers sometimes have trouble making these numbers fit on
their craft, and also may have trouble making them stick for long periods
of time because of the chemicals used in the manufacturing process.
-
State boating agencies
often resist suggestions that canoe/kayak registration dollars and the
resulting revenue received from the Wallop-Breaux Trust Fund be set aside
specifically to serve the needs of the paddling community. Paddlers are
reluctant to support registration without assurances that state agencies
would spend canoe/kayak registration monies on legitimate paddling-related
needs.
-
Many paddlers own numerous
canoes and kayaks in order to accommodate the wide variety of water
conditions and paddling objectives. Avid paddlers often own in excess of
ten canoes and kayaks. Requiring registration of each canoe or kayak could
easily result in a typical paddler paying far more for registration than
other boaters.
-
In addition to the
registration fees, the multi-digit registration numbers often will not
stay affixed to canoes and kayaks for more than a year and must be
frequently replaced. In some states, registration will also result in the
assessment of various local fees. Canoeing and kayaking are boating
activities that are available to people of modest income, and the
accumulation of used or new canoes and kayaks can stretch over many years.
For these paddlers, the costs associated with registration can suddenly
make owning/using these canoes or kayaks unaffordable.
-
States with canoe and
kayak registration unwittingly encourage their resident paddlers to go
outside the state to paddle. Testimonials from paddlers in Ohio indicate
that they will more frequently paddle in neighboring states to avoid
registering all of their canoes and kayaks. This means that a state that
enacts canoe and kayak registration can expect to lose some
recreation-related revenue to neighboring states. Canoe/kayak registration
requirements can adversely impact tourism revenue by discouraging
out-of-state paddlers from visiting.
Federal
law only requires states to register motorized vessels. Many states have
also required that sailboats above a certain length also be registered.
Beyond that, the decisions become much more arbitrary. Canoe and kayak
registration seems to be largely driven by the realization that there are a
significant number of canoes and kayaks in operation. State boating agencies
associate those large numbers with revenue potential and the need and demand
for services such as law enforcement and rescue personnel.
Registration categories are often established by vessel length. In the
non-motorized realm, using boat-type and length to determine which craft
should be registered is problematic. Canoes and kayaks come in a
wide-variety of lengths, and any length-based registration law is likely to
require some paddlers to register while ignoring others. Also, registering
canoes and kayaks raises the question of whether such registration
requirements are fair unless surf skis, sail boards, rowing shells,
surfboards, rafts, and wave skis are also required to be registered.
What
is the ACA position on canoe/kayak registration?
The ACA believes that states should encourage and support canoeing and
kayaking as healthy, non-polluting activities. Most canoe/kayak registration
proposals that ACA has seen to date are onerous plans that would have the
result of discouraging participation in canoeing and kayaking. These
registration proposals typically reflect a lack of understanding about
paddlesports and a lack of research into the potential impact on paddlers.
State
boating agencies should have a clear record of collaborating with, and
serving the needs of the paddlesports community prior to seeking
funding support from paddlers. Registration or any other legislative
proposal affecting paddlers should be the result of collaboration between
paddlesports clubs and organizations and state boating officials. Paddlers
as well as state boating agencies should oppose registration efforts that
are not the result of such collaboration.
The ACA
will judge the merits of any registration bill that results from such
collaboration on a case-by-case basis. ACA will oppose any proposal that
fails to address the following issues:
-
The merits of the
registration proposal must outweigh the bureaucratic and financial burden
to paddlers;
-
The proposal must enjoy
widespread support from paddlers in the state and be endorsed by a
majority of the state's paddling clubs;
-
The proposal cannot
require the placement of traditional boat numbers;
-
The proposal should have a
fee structure that reflects the lower enforcement, access, and pollution
costs associated with canoes and kayaks;
-
The proposal should ensure
that registration is convenient and affordable for paddlers that own
multiple canoes and kayaks; and
-
The proposal must include
adequate guarantees that the funds derived from registration will be used
to effectively serve the needs and interests of the paddlesports
community.
- Above sent by:
- Paul Sanford, Director
- Stewardship and Public
Policy
- American Canoe
Association
- 7432 Alban Station
Blvd. Suite B-232
- Springfield, VA
22150-2311
- Phone: 703.451.0141
ext. 20
- Fax: 703.451.2245
-
www.americancanoe.org
-
- Canoe & Kayak Registration-FPPA
Talking Points and Concerns
- Florida Professional Paddlesports
Association (FPPA)
- In
1995 or thereabouts, a national initiative to fund wildlife conservation
called “Teeming with Wildlife” started. The intent as we understand it was
to add an excise tax to wildlife viewing related items such as backpacks,
hiking boots, bird seed, canoes and kayaks. As of 2005, this initiative is
still active and looking to gain momentum and FWCC is the main contact for
the State of Florida. Is this another source of
funding for FWCC from canoes & kayaks? Would this excise tax be levied
against motorized vessels? Canoes and kayaks would pay registration plus
an excise tax?
-
Paddling as nature-based tourism is a clean and family oriented industry.
Tourism is the number one industry in the state of Florida with
nature-base tourism a huge component. Paddling promotes nature-based
tourism, paddling supports tourism.
- As
business owners we pay tangible tax on each and every canoe and kayak we
own. We pay tax.
- Most
outfitters and paddlers are property owners in their county of business
and/or residence and therefore pay property tax which goes to support
county boat ramps/accesses and parks.
- 99%
of the outfitters buy and use fuel for their buses and vans and therefore
pay fuel tax. Customers drive to the outfitters and therefore pay fuel
tax. Therefore paddlers are contributing to the fuel tax distribution that
FWC receives.
- As
rental operations we collect sales tax on every rental therefore
contributing to the economy of the state. We collect sales tax on each and
every rental except tax exempt groups.
- We
pay sales tax on our equipment. Most outfitters buy new canoes and kayaks
each year to replace old equipment. Lifejackets, boat cushions, whistles,
and paddles are usually replaced on an annual basis. As outfitters we
continually support the boating industry and the economy of the state.
- Many
paddlers have fishing licenses, they just choose to fish out of
paddlecraft instead of motorized boats. Most paddlers are already
contributing to FWC through fishing licenses. Paddlers fish, paddlers
pay.
- Many
outfitters already have to pay to use County Park accesses.
- Many
outfitters already have to pay to use State Park accesses.
- Many
outfitters already have to pay to use Division of Forestry
accesses.
- Many
outfitters already have to pay to use NPS accesses.
- Most
outfitters do not use FWC boat ramps. There are only 200 in the state.
Examples are: in DeSoto County, the larger outfitters do not use the one
FWC boat ramp next to the DeSoto Marina. In Hardee County the FWC boat
ramp is called “Bloody Bucket” because it is used as dumping ground for
dead animals. Once a year the outfitters use that ramp because they cannot
use the County ramp in Zolfo Springs because of a festival. Both ramps are
not in the best of shape.
-
Paddlers use conventional boat ramps but not by choice. Existing concrete
ramps damage canoes and kayaks. Paddlers try to avoid standard ramps.
Canoes and kayaks don’t need expensive boatramps. Canoes and kayaks do not
“power load” at boat ramps so there is no danger of them causing damage to
a boat ramp.
-
Canoes and kayaks do not pose any sort of threat to manatees, sea grass
beds, other boaters, or to the environment or boating in general.
- Many
paddlers own numerous canoes and kayaks in order to accommodate the wide
variety of water conditions and paddling opportunities. As being required
to register each of these vessels could easily result in paddlers paying
far more for registration than other boaters.
-
Registration would require some sort of sticker. Stickers will not adhere
to the “dimpled” finish of many canoes and kayaks. Stickers would not be
visible on many kayaks because of the design.
- The
manpower to remove and add stickers to large fleets of canoes and kayaks
on an annual basis would be cost prohibitive including the accompanying
paperwork. Titles taken by the state years ago will have to be retrieved.
Many canoes and kayaks don’t even titles.
-
Canoe and kayak retailers would need a “dealer” tag/sticker to be able to
“demo” canoes and kayaks.
- If
canoes and kayaks are to registered, what about bikes? Both are
recreational modes of transportation and exercise. The only difference is
that bikes use roads, sidewalks, and paths that require public funds to
build and maintain. Canoes and kayaks utilize existing waterways that
require little maintenance and that already exist.
- The
proponents of canoe and kayak registration like to point to the number of
canoe and kayak fatalities as a rationale for canoe and kayak
registration. As the members of FPPA have not experienced or seen proof of
these numbers, we do not hold that canoeing and kayaking fatalities or
accidents are as dramatic as the boating industry would lead us to believe
in the state of Florida.
-
Canoe and kayak registration is being pushed by motorized boating
interests who do not represent the paddlesports industry or individual
paddlers.
- Compiled by
- Rebecca Ann (Becky)
Bragg, President
- Florida Professional
Paddlesports Association (FPPA)
- P.O. Box 1764
- Arcadia, FL 34265
- 863-494-1215
- 863-494-4391 fax
-
www.paddleflausa.com
-
www.canoefla@desoto.net
- Professional Paddlesports
Association (PPA)
- In October 2002, the PPA Board
passed the following resolution:
- "At this time PPA
opposes canoe registration legislation but would like to participate with
[the National Association of State Boating Law Administrators] NASBLA in
creating a model bill. PPA will work with NASBLA to create of a model
bill for canoe and kayak registration that takes into account key issues
to the paddlesports community, including stickering, multiple boat
ownership, and funding for paddlesports programs."
The purpose of this resolution and the creation of a model bill would be
to draw a line in the sand with regards to what issues our industry would
have to have assurances on in order for us to support a bill. No model
bill has been drafted as a result of this resolution. For the time being,
PPA remains opposed to canoe and kayak registration.
Matthew E. Menashes, Executive Director
- Professional
Paddlesports Association, Inc.
- 7432 Alban Station
Boulevard, Suite B-232
- Springfield, Virginia
22150
-
- Phone: (703) 451-3864
- Fax: (703) 451-1015
-
matt@propaddle.com
-
www.propaddle.com
-
- Brevard County Commissioner, Ron
Pritchard's response to FPPA Letter of Opposition to Registration
- "Boaters pay a registration why shouldn't
you...after all, you're using the waterways and all it's amenities...it's
not a question of "taxing" it's a matter of paying your fair
share...additionally, last year in Florida 21% of all boating fatalities
involved canoes/kayaks/row boats - all un-powered..." via e-mail,
Oct. 21,2005 from Ron Pritchard, Chairman, Board of County Commissioners,
Brevard County
- Note: Mr. Pritchard's
numbers on boating fatalities is skewed to make the numbers look worse
that they actually are. Mr. Pritchard is also past president of Citizens
for Florida Waterways, a motor boat group pushing for registration.